Checking for Understanding & Feedback
Exit Ticket
A few final questions collected at the door tell you what to teach tomorrow
Use this when
What is it?
An exit ticket is one to three questions, answered silently and independently in the last five minutes, and collected as students leave. You then sort the answers rather than mark them, and let tomorrow's teaching respond. It replaces the two least reliable signals in teaching — "any questions?" and the confident nod — with thirty small pieces of evidence, gathered while there is still time to act.
The steps
- Write the ticket when you plan the lesson, not at 2:55. Ask yourself what students must be able to do by the end. One recall question, one application question, and optionally:What's one thing you're still unsure about?If you cannot write the ticket, the lesson does not yet know where it is going.
- Keep the format fixed and small. Slips, the back page, or a corner of the book. Same ritual daily. Five minutes, silent, names on. Tell them why:This one's for me, not for marks — it tells me what to teach tomorrow.
- Collect at the door. Make it part of your exit routine (Strong Finish): tickets into your hand or the tray on the way out.
- Sort, don't mark. Three piles in five minutes: got it, nearly, not yet. No grades, no ticks, no comments. The ticket is a thermometer, not an assignment.
- Let tomorrow answer it, visibly. Open with the pattern:Two-thirds of us nailed the method, but half dropped the units — watch the first example.Reteach when the not yet pile is the majority; see the small group when it is a few.
- Keep the loop visible. Students need to see their tickets steering the lessons. That visibility is what keeps their answers honest and their effort real.
What it looks like
Five minutes before the end, Mr Bakker's 10-year-olds know the drill: slips out, three questions on the board — a perimeter calculation, a spot-the-mistake, and one thing you're not sure about yet. Mostly silence; he reminds one table, "Your own brain, please — it's for me." At the door he takes the slips like tickets at a cinema. That evening he sorts: twenty seconds a slip. Fourteen got it, nine nearly — the same error, an extra side added — four not yet. Six slips ask some version of "when do we times instead of add?" Tomorrow's Do Now is three perimeter questions and one wrong answer to correct, and he opens with: "Your tickets told me something interesting."
How you’ll know it’s working
- The ticket exists at planning time. Ask to see it before the lesson, not after.
- The last five minutes are silent and independent, and collection is part of the exit routine.
- The teacher can say, next morning and from memory, what the three piles were.
- Tomorrow's lesson visibly opens from the tickets, and students hear it doing so.
Pitfalls & fixes
- Too many questions. Ten-question tickets create marking debt, and marking debt kills the routine within a fortnight. Three questions, sortable in seconds each, is the ceiling.
- Vague questions. "How did you find today?" produces feelings, not evidence. Every question needs an answer you can sort as right, nearly, or not yet.
- Collecting and never acting. This is worse than not collecting: it teaches students the ritual is theatre, so their answers become theatre. If you cannot act on it tomorrow, do not set it today.
- Grading them. The moment tickets carry marks, students optimise for looking right instead of being honest, and your thermometer starts lying. Keep them consequence-free and say so.
Weigh it up
Why it’s worth it
- You find the misconception the day it forms, not a week later in a book pile. Thirty small pieces of evidence replace the nod, while there is still time to act on them.
- Marking load falls. Sorting into three piles takes minutes where marking takes hours, and it changes tomorrow's teaching where marking often changes nothing.
- Tomorrow's plan half-writes itself: the piles tell you whether to reteach, tweak, or move on, and yesterday's ticket becomes today's Do Now.
- Students see their answers steering the lessons, and honesty starts to feel worthwhile. "I don't get it" becomes useful information to give, which is its own culture shift.
- Endings stop fizzling. The last five minutes get a silent, purposeful routine instead of a drift towards the bell.
The costs
- It taxes the day twice: five lesson-minutes that could have been practice, and a nightly sorting habit that is light per class but compounds across a timetable — five groups is 150 slips a day. Sane versions exist: rotate two focus classes daily, or ticket every lesson and sort deeply twice a week.
- The data invites overreaction. One scrappy ticket after a hot afternoon is noise, and replanning everything nightly is the fast route to abandoning the routine.
Adaptations
- Early years / lower primary: oral or show-me versions — a sticker vote on the way out, or one question answered to the teacher at the door.
- Secondary / post-16: in exam classes, make one question a past-paper fragment, so the sorting doubles as gap analysis.
- Large classes: sort every slip into piles, but read the "unsure about" line for one row per day on rotation.
- Digital classrooms: a form auto-sorts the piles for you. Keep the "one thing you're unsure about" box — that is where the useful surprises live.
Where this comes from
Old end-of-lesson practice, codified as "Exit Ticket" in Teach Like a Champion; the engine is the formative-assessment case built by Black and Wiliam, where the adjustment, not the collection, is what moves learning.
Sources
Related techniques
Ratings & discussion
Ratings loading…
Ratings come only from the stars. Votes on comments never change a technique’s score.