All the Way Right
When an answer is nearly right, ask warmly for the missing piece instead of supplying it
Use this when
What is it?
All the Way Right is the move to make when an answer is nearly correct: credit the part that is right, say warmly that it is not yet complete, and ask the same student for the missing piece rather than supplying it yourself. Teachers finish students' answers many times a day, often without noticing. When you stop doing so, the class learns that the standard is the complete answer, and that students are the ones expected to reach it.
The steps
- Listen to the whole answer before you respond. Work out which part is right and which is missing. Much of the rounding up happens in the first second after a student stops talking.
- Credit the right part precisely. Say what is correct, in a full sentence:The cause you've given is right.The student needs to know how close they are before you ask for more.
- Say it is not complete, and stay warm. Nearly there. What's missing?Your tone should suggest that the rest is clearly within reach.
- Give one pointer, then wait. If the question draws a blank, narrow the search:Check the second half of the definition.Then leave at least three seconds of silence (Wait Time).
- Ask the same student for the complete answer. Once the missing piece surfaces, ask them to put the whole thing together:Good. Now the full answer, start to finish.The finished version should be spoken aloud by the student, in their own words.
- Hold the same standard for everyone. Ask your most confident students for complete answers as often as anyone else. The class tends to work out where the bar sits within days.
What it looks like
Mr Szabo's class of 14-year-olds is reviewing the League of Nations. "Why did the League fail? …Leon?" "Because America never joined." "True, and it matters. It's not the whole answer yet. What happened when a country simply ignored the League?"
Leon shrugs. Mr Szabo begins, "It couldn't…" and stops himself, because the rest of the answer would have followed. "Think about what the League had to make anyone obey." There is a long pause. "It didn't have an army?" "So put it together. The full answer." "The League failed because America never joined, and it had no army, so it couldn't force anyone to do anything." "That's the whole thing. Everyone write that sentence." Two rows back, a hand that had been waiting to rescue Leon goes down.
How you’ll know it’s working
- Exchanges over nearly-right answers end with the student saying the complete version rather than hearing yours.
- After "what's missing?" there is a genuine pause while the student searches, and you allow it to stand.
- Film a lesson and count how often you complete an answer on a student's behalf. Over two or three weeks the count should fall towards zero.
- First attempts grow longer: students begin to include the second half of an answer before anyone asks for it.
Pitfalls & fixes
- Finishing it for them. "So what you're saying is…" followed by the perfect version is the very habit this technique exists to break, and it is at its strongest when time is short. Record a lesson and count how often you do it; noticing is most of the cure.
- Holding out on a wrong idea. If the idea itself is wrong, asking "what's missing?" sends the student hunting for a piece that does not exist. Correct the idea instead, or use Circle Back. Save this technique for answers that are genuinely on the way.
- Letting it become a guessing game. Three public guesses help nobody. If two pointers have not found the gap, the knowledge is missing: teach the piece, then return to the student for the complete version.
- Confusing complete with word-perfect. If the substance is all there, accept the answer in whatever words carry it. Insisting on your exact phrasing turns high expectations into pedantry. If the wording itself needs improving, that is Say It Again, Better.
Weigh it up
Why it’s worth it
- The class's definition of "finished" changes. Once fragments stop earning full credit, students stop offering them, and first answers tend to become more complete within weeks.
- The student who was nearly right does the remaining thinking. Every answer completed on a student's behalf is practice they did not get.
- You collect sharper assessment information. A rounded-up answer is recorded as understanding in your head and in the student's; a held answer shows you exactly which half is missing, while there is still lesson time left to fix it.
- The version the class hears, repeats and writes down is the complete one, so notes and books end up carrying full answers.
- It communicates high expectations in a way students can feel. The expectancy research suggests that students tend to move towards what their teachers visibly expect, and holding out for completeness makes that expectation concrete several times a lesson.
The costs
- It is slower than accepting an answer and moving on. Each held answer adds twenty or thirty seconds, so choose the questions where completeness genuinely matters.
- It keeps a nearly-right student in the spotlight for longer, and in the early weeks some students find that harder than being plainly wrong. The specific credit in step 2 is what makes the experience bearable.
- It demands precise subject knowledge at speed: you have to know what a complete answer contains, on your feet, every time. A fuzzy definition of your own gets exposed as well.
Adaptations
- Early years / lower primary: the missing piece is usually the "because". Ask for the two-part sentence: "It floats because…?" Model the complete sentence where needed, and have the child say it back in full.
- Primary: give the class friendly language for the move. "That's half the answer. Which half is missing?" becomes a routine question that students eventually ask themselves.
- Secondary / post-16: tie completeness to how answers are marked: "You've given the cause. The question wants cause and consequence." Older students can run the check on each other: "Is Maya's answer complete? What would you add?"
- Maths and practical subjects: the missing piece is often the units, the condition or the final step: "Right method. Something's missing from the answer." In practical work, hold out for the complete action: "Nearly. Show me the follow-through as well."
Where this comes from
Doug Lemov codified and popularised the approach as "Right Is Right" in Teach Like a Champion; we use a different name here while recognising its origin. The insistence on complete answers is far older than the book, and is visible wherever academic expectations are high.
Sources
Related techniques
Ratings & discussion
Ratings loading…